Wikibooks:Kedai Kopi: Perbezaan antara semakan

Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
Teg: MassMessage delivery
Teg: MassMessage delivery
Baris 1,222:
 
[[User:RamzyM (WMF)|RamzyM (WMF)]] 06:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Pesanan dihantar oleh Pengguna:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki yang menggunakan senarai di https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/ESEAP_project_embassies_-_SEA_%26_P&oldid=23027963 -->
 
== <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Next steps: Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) and UCoC Enforcement Guidelines</span> ==
 
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<section begin="announcement-content" />
:''<div class="plainlinks">[[m:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard/April 2022 - Board of Trustees on Next steps: Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) and UCoC Enforcement Guidelines|{{int:interlanguage-link-mul}}]] • [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&group=page-{{urlencode:Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard/April 2022 - Board of Trustees on Next steps: Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) and UCoC Enforcement Guidelines}}&language=&action=page&filter= {{int:please-translate}}]</div>''
 
The Community Affairs Committee of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees would like to thank everyone who participated in the recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC).
 
The volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review of the accuracy of the vote and has reported the total number of votes received as 2,283. Out of the 2,283 votes received, a total of 1,338 (58.6%) community members voted for the enforcement guidelines, and a total of 945 (41.4%) community members voted against it. In addition, 658 participants left comments with 77% of the comments written in English.
 
We recognize and appreciate the passion and commitment that community members have demonstrated in creating a safe and welcoming culture that stops hostile and toxic behavior, supports people targeted by such behavior, and encourages good faith people to be productive on the Wikimedia projects.
 
Even at this incomplete stage, this is evident in the comments received. While the Enforcement Guidelines did reach a threshold of support necessary for the Board to review, we encouraged voters, regardless of which way they were voting, to provide feedback on the elements of the enforcement guidelines that they felt needed to be changed or fixed, as well as why, in case it seemed advisable to launch a further round of edits that would address community concerns.
 
Foundation staff who have been reviewing comments have advised us of some of the emerging themes, and as a result we have decided as Community Affairs Committee to ask the Foundation to reconvene the drafting committee and to undertake another community engagement to refine the enforcement guidelines based on the community feedback received from the recently concluded vote.
 
For clarity, this feedback has been clustered into 4 sections as follows:
 
# To identify the type, purpose, and applicability of the training;
# To simplify the language for easier translation and comprehension by non-experts;
# To explore the concept of affirmation, including its pros and cons;
# To review the conflicting roles of privacy/victim protection and right to be heard.
 
Other issues may emerge during conversations, and particularly as the draft Enforcement Guidelines evolve, but we see these as the primary areas of concern for voters and are asking staff to facilitate review of these issues. After further engagement, the Foundation should re-run the community vote to evaluate the revamped Enforcement Outline to see if the new document is then ready for its official ratification.
 
Further, we are aware of the concerns with the note 3.1 in the Universal Code of Conduct Policy. We are directing the Foundation to facilitate a review of this language to ensure that the Policy meets its intended purposes of supporting a safe and inclusive community, without waiting for the planned review of the entire Policy at the end of year.
 
Again, we thank all who participated, thinking about these critical and difficult challenges and contributing to better approaches across the movement to working together well.
 
Best,
 
Rosie
 
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight (she/her)<br />
Acting Chair, Community Affairs Committee <br />
Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees<br /><section end="announcement-content" />
</div>
 
[[User:RamzyM (WMF)|RamzyM (WMF)]] 02:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Pesanan dihantar oleh Pengguna:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki yang menggunakan senarai di https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/ESEAP_project_embassies_-_SEA_%26_P&oldid=23027963 -->